Figure 4: My study sites (Blue star, Juno Beach; Red star, Boca Raton) in Palm Beach County, Florida, where I was assisted by the marine turtle program at the Loggerhead Marinelife Center and the Gumbo Limbo Nature Complex, respectively.
I’ve collected tissue samples from loggerhead, leatherback and green turtles nesting on two different beaches in Palm Beach County (Figure 4). These beaches were selected because of their profound differences in nesting density: Juno Beach appears to be a preferred nesting site for all three species. If these two locations are within the same nesting/breeding assemblage, I would expect to see similar behavior (e.g. similar successful mating attempts).
What we found was impressive. From 2013-2015 I determined that all three species do mate with multiple males (Loggerheads > Greens > Leatherbacks; Table 1). However, I never found a male that mated more than once. I hypothesize that either a) there are more males mating than expected, or b) females encounter unique assemblages of males as they migrate from different locations toward the nesting beach. In reality, the number of males I documented for loggerheads (~29,000) is a relatively small proportion compared to the number of females nesting in Florida (~ 200,000 turtles).
We also determined that females nesting at Boca Raton on average mated with fewer males than females at Juno Beach. Why that happens remains an interesting, but presently explained, result.
My next goal is to analyze data from 2016 which include repeat nests from the same female. Those results should indicate whether females only mate before they start nesting, or if they continue to select mates while they nest and in the process, produce hatchlings with different fathers as the breeding season progresses.
To properly plan current and future conservation efforts it is essential that baseline census estimates be quantified and robust. That’s why the information I’ve obtained is so important. It’s encouraging that the nesting populations of marine turtles in Florida are increasing. However, while this finding is positive we have no idea whether the population of males is also keeping pace. If, as our data on hatchling sex ratios suggests, the number of males being produced is in decline then so, also, should be operational sex ratios in future studies done much like mine. Those observations will be an early warning signal that the quality of future hatchlings may not match the quality of present-day hatchlings, and that a dramatic shift in population size and health may be just around the corner.
This research was partially supported by The National Save The Sea Turtle Foundation’s Scholarship Program.
Species and Study Site
Mean Number of Fathers per Nest (A)
Mean Number of Nesting Females (B)
Estimated Number of Males (A x B)
Loggerheads
Juno Beach
Boca Raton
5.1
4.2
5,717
487
29,161
2,045
Greens
Juno Beach
Boca Raton
2.7
1.4
3,432
220
9,266
308
Leatherbacks
Juno Beach
Boca Raton
1.6
1.2
121
11
193
13
Table 1: Method for estimating the number of males breeding at my study sites. I used data from the gels (Figure 3) to determine how many males, on average, contributed genes to the hatchlings emerging from each sampled nest (Column A). I used known information about how many nests each female places on a beach during a given breeding season to estimate the size of the female population (Column B). The estimated number of males is then A x B, assuming each female mated with a different subset of males. That assumption was confirmed at my study sites.